City Wire
By Erin Norris and David S. Lewis |
|
Clean Air Act Holds Strong in Recent Case
In a 53-47 vote, the Senate shot down a Republican-backed resolution that challenged the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency in imposing restrictions without congressional approval. Citing Ohio's reliance on coal-fired power plants, Senator George Voinovich supported the resolution, expressing concern over the economic effect further restrictions could have on the state. Senator Sherrod Brown opposed the bill, but acknowledged the possible financial stress new laws could pose. He instead suggested a one-year waiting period for new EPA laws.
Editor's Take: Voinovich and other Republicans would be happy to take the teeth out of any EPA action, but it might be a little . . . well, soon. Too soon! Hey, we are more aware than ever what happens when powerful companies are not watched and regulated closely . . . tar balls. If the EPA has to suck up to Congress every time they need a power company to not destroy a mountain, we might as well just pave the whole damned state. And Brown's suggestion is great - let them have a year to f**k things up every time the EPA realizes they are doing something stupid.
$4 Million Expansion of Sex-Slavery Relief Proposed
In a recent meeting, Attorney General Richard Cordray and the Ohio Trafficking in Persons Study Commission announced that $4 million was required in order to support an expansion in sex-trafficking relief. The number includes the salaries and benefits - around $77,000 per year - of caseworkers, as well as the cost of institutions that provide care and rehabilitation for victims. Private institutions, as well as the general public, could potentially cover the cost.
Editor's Take: It doesn't take much time on Google to see what a problem this is in Ohio, and the last year has seen much coverage of human trafficking in local media. The warriors fighting this are tireless and working from all levels of society; we have to support them in any way we can. Again, kudos to Cordray for taking this horrible bull by its horns.
Bill Introduced to Privatize State Prisons
In an alleged attempt to cut costs and alleviate the deficit, state lawmakers have introduced a bill that would hand Ohio's prisons over to the corporate realm. Prison workers are expressing concern that this would be a threat to unions, and may result in the loss of jobs. If passed, the bill would also restrict the state's authority on how prisons are operated.
Editor's Take: If prisons become moneymaking ventures, what incentive could they possibly have to try and effectively rehabilitate prisoners? Any business needs regular customers; I can nearly see them teaching breaking-and-entering seminars. With a world-high percentage of the population locked up in prison in America, we need to feel secure that corrections facilities are trying to get prisoners out, and to keep them out . . . which would go against the basic notion of a commercial prison. We need our country to be run by responsible elected officials, and we need to keep our prisons under careful regulation; if anything, we need more regulation, not less. The very notion of a Halliburton-style prison gives me night terrors.
Columbus Police to Proceed with Redistricting Plans
Despite police unions' protest against the city's plans to alter precinct boundaries and patrol districts, plans were ultimately upheld. Claiming that it was a contract violation, The Fraternal Order of Police filed suit and appealed to a judge to stop the plans. The redistricting is expected to take effect on July 11th.
Editor's Take: The FOP alleges that the public and officers were left out of the redistricting, and that it will disrupt relationships built by officers with the communities they have served. The public has every right to cry out when the police fail or overstep their boundaries, but whoever heard of the public dictating strategy? How many officers are qualified to determine where they are most needed? Perhaps we should let officers do their jobs, and city government do its job. Likewise, the police union can keep its eye on wages and benefits, but should stay out of city safety strategy.
Originally Published: July 1, 2010
